Boris Johnson and his advisers have been accused of responding too slowly to the coronavirus outbreak by a former chief scientific adviser, who expressed shock that the Cheltenham festival and other big events were allowed to go ahead in mid-March.
Prof Sir David King said he was “really saddened by the predicament we are in” and that the UK “didn’t respond so much sooner once this epidemic broke out in China”.
King, who was adviser from 2000 to 2007, said it appeared that there was a plateau in new infections but that the failure to record deaths outside hospitals means “we really haven’t a clue where we are” and comparisons with other countries were “beginning to look really awful”.
With pressure building on the government over the UK’s high number of deaths, Dominic Raab, the foreign secretary, is expected to announce on Thursday afternoon a lengthening of the lockdown for at least three weeks. The announcement will be made after a meeting of the emergency Cobra committee, which will include the leaders of the devolved nations – Nicola Sturgeon, Mark Drakeford and Arlene Foster.
However, Raab is unlikely to say anything about how the UK plans to end its shutdown, despite speculation that certain sectors could be brought back to work, younger people allowed out or schools reopened.
On Wednesday, Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, was pressing for the government to publish the outlines of an exit strategy but Sir Patrick Vallance, the UK’s chief scientific adviser, and Prof Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, have both said it is too early to talk about this while the death rate has not come down.
King outlined his criticisms of the government’s strategy so far in an interview with LBC radio, where he said a report published on his watch in 2006 showed an outbreak of this sort would spread everywhere in the world within three months because of air travel.
“That, of course, is what has happened – and it seems that we were unprepared and we didn’t take action,” he said. Imagine, 16 March, having a horse race go on with a massive crowd at Cheltenham. We didn’t manage this until too late and every day’s delay has resulted in further deaths in the United Kingdom.”
King said austerity under the coalition government had led to cuts to the risk management programmes, which had made the UK unprepared for pandemics.
“For me, this is very upsetting because we had set this preparation process in place, as I say, back in 2006,” he said, arguing that this had cost lives.
King said the government needed to “massively step up measures” including mass testing, which the current chief scientific advisers and medical advisers had suggested until recent days was not practical.
“Until we get testing done on a very much wider scale, we’re not going to begin to manage this,” he said. “If we go around the world and see where there has been better behaviour, it isn’t only in the wealthy countries.
“You go to Greece and the management of the epidemic, starting very, very early on, has been really astoundingly good. Go to Africa, go to Rwanda, you’ll find the same thing.
“So I think it has been taking the eye off the ball, hoping that it would somehow blow away and we are acting too late. In rugby terms, this is a hospital pass to anyone in the driving seat at this point in time.”
No 10 rejected the criticism, saying the chief scientific and medical experts had previously addressed the claim that the government acted too slowly, saying the measures had been brought in at the right time.
At its regular daily briefing, Downing Street said testing for coronavirus was at more than 14,000 on Monday, while capacity was more than 19,000. However, this suggests that the government will miss its target of completing 25,000 tests a day by the end of the week. It also looks far off its ambition of 100,000 tests a day by the end of April.
No 10 also rejected the idea of publishing the list of names of scientists who sit on the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies or minutes of its meetings. The group is the crucial body that gives advice to the emergency Cobra committee, which is due to meet tomorrow to decide how long the UK should extend its lockdown for.
For the original article, follow this link https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/apr/15/boris-johnson-reacted-too-slowly-to-covid-19-says-ex-scientific-adviser